![]() |
SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - Printable Version +- Snakeoil Forums (https://forums.snakeoil-os.net) +-- Forum: Hifi Talk (https://forums.snakeoil-os.net/Forum-Hifi-Talk) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://forums.snakeoil-os.net/Forum-Hardware) +--- Thread: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? (/Thread-SQ-difference-Raspberry-Pi-vs-x86-64) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - skel - 29-Jan-2025 (28-Jan-2025, 08:26 AM)Snoopy8 Wrote:(27-Jan-2025, 10:08 PM)skel Wrote: I' am a great fan of the x86_64 machines of Shuttle. Just bought the DS50U (CPU Intel Celeron 7305, 250 Euro) which had much better SQ than the more faster machine DS50U3 with i3 CPU.Interesting... . Have you tried the Pi5, which is much cheaper? I don't have a Pi5,but tried Pi3 and Pi4 some years ago. Found x86 always much better. RE: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - Snoopy8 - 29-Jan-2025 (29-Jan-2025, 06:33 AM)skel Wrote: I don't have a Pi5,but tried Pi3 and Pi4 some years ago. Found x86 always much better.Volumio, Moode etc. are not as good as SnakeOil on Pi5, Pi4, so not surprised that you prefer x86 with SO. skel - skel - 29-Jan-2025 (29-Jan-2025, 07:42 AM)Snoopy8 Wrote:(29-Jan-2025, 06:33 AM)skel Wrote: I don't have a Pi5,but tried Pi3 and Pi4 some years ago. Found x86 always much better.Volumio, Moode etc. are not as good as SnakeOil on Pi5, Pi4, so not surprised that you prefer x86 with SO. That's true, but I also compared SO on PI against x86. May also better (SQ has more body and dynamic and is also cleaner) because of the power for my PC comes direct from the car battery vs linear DC/DC IC for the PIs. I have different SSDs for OS (SATA) and music (NVMe) as well in my PC and very fast RAM. RE: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - Snoopy8 - 06-Feb-2025 (28-Jan-2025, 10:18 AM)agent_kith Wrote: I'm hoping somewhere/someone will build a dedicated audio board with support for CM5. If properly designed and implemented it could beat x86_64 in theory (This is more a guess though).I have yet to come across a CM5 based audio player. There is a CM5 development kit https://au.element14.com/raspberry-pi/sc1755/cm5-development-kit-eu/dp/4575935 (No idea of differences between EU, US, UK etc versions) Trying to understand why the CM5 is better than the Pi5. Is the limitation the existing I/O board? And should be replaced by a dedicated audiophile board? RE: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - hkphantomgtr - 09-Apr-2025 Well, FYI, if one would like to run Roon Server in SO, Roon Server requires a x86_64 CPU. But Roon Bridge embraces both x86_64 and arm CPUs. ![]() RE: SQ difference - Raspberry Pi vs x86_64? - agent_kith - 09-Apr-2025 (06-Feb-2025, 08:46 AM)Snoopy8 Wrote: I have yet to come across a CM5 based audio player.A CM4 audio player may well be hot swappable to CM5 as the pin-outs are largely compatible. A RPi5 is an all-in-one general purpose computer. And a CM5 is more like a brain, it needs to be part of another board to become a compute unit. So if we a board that's specifically designed for audio, adding a CM5 to this board could well make it sing (as the CPU on the CM5 is a lot faster than the CM4 CPU) |